Marcos Senesi and Eric Botteghin didn’t make the most effective activate Sunday throughout the 1-0 defeat of Feyenoord at Vitesse. Jan Everse and Geert den Ouden, nevertheless, disagree about who’s most guilty for the objective towards.
“Botteghin was actually asleep,” says Den Ouden RTV Rijnmond. “He would not see the place his opponent is in any respect and simply misplaced him.” The previous striker takes it up for Senesi, who simply let Loïs Opende cross. “I feel it’s kind of blunt to say now that he scores good objectives. He performed very effectively final season. For those who decide Senesi on his defensive qualities final yr, then he has a superb cross.”
“For those who evaluate that with Botteghin, for me he’s actually over and out on the degree of Feyenoord”, Den Ouden continues. “You simply have to look at that repetition how he walks alongside. He has misplaced every little thing that’s in area. He has every little thing within the neighborhood, with or with out the ball. However for the remainder I now not discover him for the extent of Feyenoord. . “
Everse disagrees with that studying. “I did not assume he was enjoying that unhealthy in any respect. Once you see that lengthy Bazoer ball over sixty meters, Senesi is ten meters behind the remainder of the final line. If he had walked, it will have been offside. Apparently there’s a concern of that. Senesi made a mistake there. And Uros Spajic was nonetheless someplace across the midway line. “
“I believed he was very sloppy. Within the second half it went a bit higher, however within the first half he made errors that you’re not used to,” Everse concludes concerning the Argentinian.