It was not Steven Bergwijn’s night within the prime match in opposition to Liverpool. The Dutchman missed two important alternatives on behalf of Tottenham Hotspur to place the lead on the scoreboard at Anfield. Regardless of that, the attacker primarily will get passes and there’s discuss of ‘unhealthy luck’. VoetbalPrimeur makes a tour of the English media.
The match between Liverpool and Tottenham was an absolute winner within the Premier League. Spurs was in first place, whereas Liverpool adopted in second place. Bergwijn acquired the arrogance of José Mourinho and was allowed to start out within the base. He had 200 p.c possibilities within the second half to present his workforce the lead, however failed to take action.
The Independant offers Bergwijn a 6, particularly for his efforts. “He missed an unlimited alternative instantly after the break and hit the submit not a lot later.” The Daily Mail doesn’t perceive how Bergwijn’s effort didn’t disappear into the purpose. The Dutchman receives a 6.5. “He might have been Spurs’ hero and can surprise how his shot to the submit went off purpose.”
The Express is lots much less constructive about Bergwijn and blames him for defeat. ‘He performed a foul first half and completely ought to have scored within the second half. He was rightly taken to the aspect ‘, it says. Bergwijn receives a 4.5 for his efficiency.
Nonetheless The Categorical one of many few mediums who could be very vital of Bergwijn. The Dutchman missed two large alternatives, however is essential to Spurs by way of work ethic. “He labored laborious, each offensive and defensive,” he noticed Football.London. He ought to have achieved higher together with his two possibilities. These turned out to be very costly when Liverpool took the victory within the remaining section. ‘
‘José all the time chooses Bergwijn within the large competitions’, he sees The Mirror. “However he missed two nice alternatives.” Right here is The Evening Standard agree. ‘You’ll be able to perceive why he was pissed off. You questioned: what if? ‘